PART I: THE COGNITIVE-INFORMATIONAL DOMAIN (Logic and Geometry)
In this first domain, we will not deal with cells or cerebral lobes, but we will investigate the logical, mathematical, and informational architecture with which the Prognostica Mens computes the universe.
1. The Illusion of the Void and the Gravitational Invariant
To deconstruct the concept of space, we must first dismantle a centuries-old philosophical prejudice: the classical Newtonian idea that space is an empty box, a passive theater in which our body moves like an actor on an inert stage.
Predictive biology demonstrates that the cerebral algorithm never computes the “void”; it exclusively perceives The Scene. The scene is not a painted backdrop, but the fundamental supporting plane. This intuition rests on a single, inexorable Absolute Invariant: Gravity. Everything that exists on Earth is subject to gravity. The Subject’s interaction with the environment depends on gravity (weight, balance, posture). The Object’s interaction with the environment depends on gravity (friction, falling, stability). The “bottom”—namely the Scene—is the shared mathematical baseline allowing distinct entities (the body and things) to coexist and be measured in the same predictive calculation. To understand the vital importance of this anchoring, one only needs to look at deep space. In microgravity, astronauts suffer an acute disorientation (known as Space Adaptation Syndrome) precisely because, lacking the shared gravitational vector (the “bottom”), the nervous system goes into crisis: it can no longer unify the perception of its own body with that of objects floating in the cabin. The common denominator is missing.
2. The Two Relational Geometries on the Scene
With the gravitational anchor secured, TIM postulates that spatial consciousness arises from the algorithmic clash between two profoundly different regimes of vectorial interaction coexisting on the same Scene:
- Allocentric Space (Object/Object Interaction): This is the geometric logic of the scene understood as an architecture independent of us. This algorithm calculates the distances, positions, and vectors that physical objects have exclusively among themselves. Imagine a chessboard resting on a table: allocentric logic encodes that “the Knight is two squares away from the King.” This Object/Object interaction is a rigid and unaltered mathematical fact, remaining identical regardless of whether you are sitting to the north of the table, to the south, or have your eyes closed. It is the map of the external world.
- Egocentric Space (Soma/Object Interaction): This is the geometric logic of immediate action and survival. This algorithm exclusively calculates the vectorial relationship between our biological body (the Soma) and the elements present on the Scene. If you decide to grab the chess Knight, the mind must calculate a completely new vector: “The wooden piece is 40 centimeters to the right of my shoulder, and I must extend my arm with a specific force.” This map is extremely dynamic and unstable: simply turning your head one millimeter requires the entire equation to be recalculated from scratch.
3. The Chunking Algorithm (From Multiplicity to Unity)
For the body to move in the Scene without the mind exhausting its metabolic energy (ATP) on millions of simultaneous calculations, the predictive algorithm performs a masterful data compression operation: Spatial Chunking.
Imagine having to line up behind six people waiting at a supermarket checkout. In a first fraction of a second, the allocentric system calculates the individual mathematical relationships on the scene (Person A is 50 cm from Person B; Person B is 60 cm from Person C). If the brain had to calculate our egocentric distance from each of those six continuously moving people, the system would undergo a computational overload. The mind solves the problem by fusing these interactions into a “Meta-Object.” The multiple Object/Object spatial interaction is mathematically transformed into a single Line/Scene interaction. The six people cease to be isolated variables and become The Line: a unitary and coherent block, endowed with its own global orientation relative to the floor. At this point, the egocentric system relates to a single Macroscopic Object: it perceives that “The Line” is to our left and calculates the single fluid trajectory needed to join it, thereby nullifying the Prediction Error (Δp).
PART II: THE BIOPHYSICAL DOMAIN (Hardware and Experimental Anatomy)
Having defined the logic of spatial calculation (the software), we move to the Biophysical Domain: what are the exact neural networks (the hardware) that materially execute these informational translations? Cutting-edge neurosciences confirm this architecture point by point.
4. The Hardware of Gravity: The Vestibular Compass
Calculating the Absolute Invariant (gravity) is an uninterrupted physical process. Neuroanatomically, orientation calculations do not begin in the eyes, but in the microscopic crystals (otoliths) located in the inner ear. As demonstrated by the pioneering clinical studies of Thomas Brandt and Marianne Dieterich (1999), these sensors detect Earth’s gravitational acceleration and send a constant stream of data to a specific brain network: the Parieto-Insular Vestibular Cortex (PIVC). This network acts as the biological gyroscope of the Prognostica Mens, anchoring every future visual computation to the inflexible vector of “down.”
5. The Extractor of the Scene: The Discovery of the PPA
How does the brain mathematically separate the “Scene” (the shared supporting plane) from the individual objects transiting upon it? The definitive proof of TIM’s topological intuition lies in one of the most elegant experiments in modern cognitive neuroscience, conducted in 1998 by researchers Russell Epstein and Nancy Kanwisher at MIT.
Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), they discovered a specific area in the human brain that activated massively only when subjects viewed images of landscapes, rooms, or horizons, but remained silent if they observed isolated faces or objects. They renamed this area the Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA). The astonishing discovery occurred when the researchers showed subjects images of completely empty rooms, stripped of any objects or furniture: the PPA activated with the same violence. Conversely, if they showed objects (like a chair or a table) stripped of any floor or wall acting as a background, the PPA shut down. This incontrovertibly demonstrates that the PPA is not interested in objects: it encodes the geometry of spatial boundaries and extracts exclusively the navigable supporting plane. This is the biological proof that the Scene is the foundational construct preceding any interaction.
6. The Allocentric Hardware and the “Object Vector Cells”
With the gravitational Scene constructed, the two relational geometries (allocentric and egocentric) are calculated by physically distant hardware. The Allocentric Domain, which calculates Object/Object interaction and environmental structure, resides deep in the medial temporal lobe. This veritable “cerebral GPS” utilizes a network of cells whose discovery is continuously evolving:
- Place Cells: Discovered by John O’Keefe (1971) in the Hippocampus. They act as a “pin” on the map: they light up to signal that we are in a specific point of a known environment.
- Grid Cells (Spatial Metric): Discovered by the Mosers (Nobel 2014) in the Entorhinal Cortex. They function like graph paper: they form a perfect hexagonal matrix overlapping the floor, calculating absolute distances (the “centimeters” of the room).
- Boundary Vector Cells (Limits of the Scene): Described by Neil Burgess’s teams (2009), they exclusively map insurmountable physical obstacles and architectural boundaries (e.g., walls), establishing the closed perimeter of the Scene.
- Object Vector Cells (The Object/Object Network): This is the very recent and revolutionary discovery by the Moser laboratory (Høydal et al., 2019). These cells activate specifically to encode the vectorial distance and direction of one object relative to another within the environment, regardless of the observer’s position.
It is thanks to the combined action of these networks that the brain manages to map the complex “Object/Object” interaction (such as the distance between people in the line). Conversely, the Egocentric Domain, governed by the dorsal stream networks of the parietal lobe (Goodale & Milner, 1992), ignores the general map and exclusively calculates the Soma/Object muscular interaction vector in real-time.
7. The Maze Paradigm: Decoding the Environment
To fully grasp the elegance of this biophysical model, let us apply TIM to the classic neuroscience experiment: the rat in the maze. Laypeople often make the mistake of considering the maze as an “empty space.” Under the lens of TIM, the maze floor is the Scene: it is the gravitational Absolute Invariant encoded by the rodent’s PPA. If the floor is the Scene, the Objects are the walls, the corners, and the junctions. The maze is not a void, but a complex network of Object/Object interactions resting on the Scene (Wall A is parallel to Wall B, and Wall C closes the passage at 30 centimeters).
As the rat runs, the entire hardware activates simultaneously: the Grid Cells unroll the metric on the floor calculating the distance traveled, the Boundary Cells map the presence of the walls, and the Object Vector Cells calculate the vectorial relationship between one junction and another. The rodent’s brain thus possesses the exact mathematical architecture of the environment, anchored to gravity, even before having decided which way to turn.
8. The Mathematical Boundary: The Markov Blanket
These two spatial worlds (the deep map of the Hippocampus and the superficial map of the Parietal Cortex) do not communicate in a formless void, but are separated by a statistical and informational boundary that the physics of Active Inference defines as the Markov Blanket.
Applied to neurosciences by mathematician Karl Friston, the Markov Blanket is the mathematical epidermis defining what the “Self” is and what the “World” is. It is composed of two layers:
- Sensory States (Input): The incoming doors (e.g., the photons bouncing off the maze walls and striking the rat’s retina).
- Active or Motor States (Output): The outgoing doors (e.g., the nerve signal flexing the leg muscles).
Everything “inside” this protective blanket is the brain with its predictive models; everything “outside” is the chaotic universe. Returning to our rat: the Hippocampus has built a perfect allocentric map of the walls, but this map is buried deep within the brain. For the rat to actually execute the muscular turn at the junction, this complex abstract geometry must cross the boundary: it must be translated into the egocentric “active states” of the Markov Blanket. At this exact juncture, the supreme translator intervenes.
9. The Holographic Translator: The “Heading Disorientation” Syndrome
TIM does not deduce the existence of this translator purely philosophically, but relies on decades of raw clinical evidence. In 2009, renowned cognitive neuroscientist Eleanor Maguire and researcher Stephen Vann published a monumental review study. They analyzed reports of patients who had suffered isolated lesions to the Retrosplenial Cortex (RSC), a deep area located at the exact crossroads between the temporal lobe (the map of the world) and the parietal lobe (the map of the body).
The researchers identified an illuminating clinical syndrome, defined as Heading Disorientation. These patients presented an astounding clinical picture: they perfectly recognized buildings, neighborhoods, and could read maps (the allocentric calculation of the Hippocampus was completely intact). However, if physically placed on the street in front of those same buildings they recognized, they did not know which way to turn their body to walk towards home. The patients saw the Scene, but without the RSC they could no longer translate the external architecture into a personal movement vector.
The RSC is, to all intents and purposes, the anatomical “gearbox” of the brain. According to TIM, this mechanism acts in a way comparable to the Holographic Principle of theoretical physics: the Retrosplenial Cortex takes the immense bulk of information enclosed in the three-dimensional volume of the Scene (the Object/Object matrix) and “flattens” it, projecting it in a compressed and explicit way onto the two-dimensional surface of our bodily boundary (the Markov Blanket). The maze junction is placed in an unequivocal vectorial relationship with the rat’s snout: “The opening is located to my right.” The translator has united the two domains, allowing the body to trigger the exact muscle contraction.
Conclusion: The Identitary Hologram
The clear subdivision between the logical domain (how the mind structures the scene to survive) and the biological domain (which exact neural networks materially execute the calculation) gives us an unassailable picture. We are not immaterial spirits dropped into an inert Cartesian void. Spatial experience is the greatest and most costly algorithmic triumph of biology, generated by gravitational anchoring and the ceaseless translation between the geometric order of the world (the allocentric domain) and the vital necessity of action (the egocentric domain).
The final phenomenological product, projected moment by moment by our Retrosplenial Cortex, is the Identitary Hologram. The Prognostica Mens finally comes to perceive itself as a coherent and defined entity, enclosed and protected by its own sensori-motor shield, yet simultaneously intimately embedded, active, and resonant with the inexorable gravitational forces of the universe.
Bibliography
[1] Leonardi, S. (2026). Toward an Integrated Theory of Mind: The Atlas of the Predictive Mind and the Sensorimotor Matrix. Zenodo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20300789
[2] Brandt, T., & Dieterich, M. (1999). The vestibular cortex: its locations, functions, and disorders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 871(1), 293-312.
[3] Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392(6676), 598-601.
[4] Friston, K. (2013). Life as we know it. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(86), 20130475.
[5] Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in neurosciences, 15(1), 20-25.
[6] Høydal, Ø. A., Skytøen, E. R., Andersson, S. O., Moser, M. B., & Moser, E. I. (2019). Object-vector coding in the medial entorhinal cortex. Nature, 568(7752), 400-404.
[7] Lever, C., Burton, S., Jeewajee, A., O’Keefe, J., & Burgess, N. (2009). Boundary vector cells in the subiculum of the hippocampal formation respond to the presence of environmental boundaries. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(31), 9771-9777.
[8] Moser, E. I., Kropff, E., & Moser, M. B. (2008). Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Annual review of neuroscience, 31, 69-89.
[9] Vann, S. D., Aggleton, J. P., & Maguire, E. A. (2009). What does the retrosplenial cortex do?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(11), 792-802.